>>10876285Glad we could come to an understanding then. Not like I'd be unoticable here, anyway.
>Can't fault him for leavingAnd have you seen how he looks now? It's like the site was draining away his life force before, though that could just be his moving out of he basement. But it really is a stark difference, seeing a site which has a team who's actively invlolved in its development. Makes me wonder how it'll look a year from now, though.
>You have to jump right into itI know I know, and I have. Can't be too worried about embarrassment, anyhow.
>That's not lewd art, is it? Just nude.Not much difference, though that's another thing - it doesn't seem like they'd have done more than that either way.
>I am not a fan of women with short hair.Picky picky. Dunno about pixy cuts, but those old flapper girl cuts I like. Probably because Agatha had some of that going on too.
>>10876289An expert on women's clothing, are you?
