>>739860so what's your problem with that anon?
they could just as damn well fall into categories of anarcho-communism, communalism or what not
you two have fairly lot in common, high libertarian, progressive, argueably internationalism
they just do not like inheritable problems of capitalism similarly as you dislike ones of socialism
>>739879things are failing anf falling into decline as they are, that's that
>>739911basically axis, honestly don't know but you should be fine
