>>18008879>Also Varg and a bunch of other spergsVarg was doing it long before the alt right and he has 8 white kids.
>Not in the USA.Because white americans are a minority under 21 or so. Most WNs in america are probably not white.
>had enough power to away language in the Constitution and other founding documents Yet they couldn't change the 1790-3 naturalization acts.
>the point is that those masons were debating the value of white and black peopleAnd what the result?
>citizenship for whites only>if slavery is abolished, blacks must be deported>At the same time they were actively trying to integrate them into white societyBy annihilating their culture, with the result being that most self identified indian tribals are white or mulatto?
>A lot of Americans thought the expulsion of the Indians to Oklahoma was evil.A lot of germans disliked how hitler treated jews. The yellow star law was very unpopular. It comes down to institutions and national will, not minority opposite, right or wrong. To get back on topic, the problem with the churches is the same. You can be totally right about based christianity and still be totally defeated by the institutional power of the churches, which are deeply committed to multiracialism. Do you know where the priests in Ireland come from now? Africa. Real firebrand guys, I'll give them that. But the local church is so dead and corrupt that it can't find white priests much less white parishioners.
>Enough of the country was NOT white supremacist that they forced a compromiseIf no more nonwhites and consistent expulsions of nonwhites is supposed to be a compromise, what does a victory look like? Total nigger death? The US used to be so pro-white that a finn had to go to court to prove he was white.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5406/jamerethnhist.31.1.0011>The point is that shit was not as cut and dried as you seem to think it was the racial autism was more Himmler than Hitler"Law" in Nuremburg Law was not a joke.