>>3412369You have completely misunderstood the double slit experiment. It has zero to do with consciousness.
The scientific term "OBSERVATION" is what caused this misunderstanding, just as people misunderstand the "Big Bang" as being an explosion - scientists are bad at naming things.
Observation simply pertains to any form of measurement, with anything at all; any type of technology.
So imagine, if you will, me, passing a ball between my two hands, back and forth, forth and back over and over, now pretend this is a subatomic particle so small you can't just look at it with your eyes; how do you determine it's there?
If your answer is something along the lines of "shove something in the way as it's passing" you're on the right lines of thinking like a scientist - but unfortunately, OBSERVING it like that disrupts what it was doing (of course). But people have misinterpreted this (because it contains the word quantum; which has become a stupid-person buzzword for "magic") as being proof that conscious observation creates reality, because quantum experiments change when they're observed (quantum particles are so sensitive they're knocked off course when disrupted by measurement techniques).
Thanks for reading; don't fall into the retard pseudoscience claptrap again.