>>9977259This is a good post. Gender used to refer to the expression of sexual traits, i.e. masculine and feminine.
The 1960's gender relativists like John Money created an entire new definition from his assertion that gender informed sex.
A man can be feminine. Probably as feminine as a girl, and will defer manliness, with man being the corroborative of the sex and the gender in colloquial terms.
He is however still a male, and thus a man.
There is not much room for such a man to exist, that in all ways but sex is feminine, since by breaking down and forcefully expanding the clear definitions for man and women, also forces such men to expand with those definitions, leaving them (probably) more confused and unhappy than they otherwise would've been in a world without those confusing and artificial definition expansions.
