>>18587783Homo sapiens (niggers not included) got most of its traits from before intelligence (sapiens) entered the picture. Women enjoy being railed by a train most (typical for primate females) because all the males in the train are related and thus share large parts of their corresponding dna. It doesn't matter wheter grug or grug's younger or older brother in the trail fathers her baby. However, civilizations are lifeforms in their own right and come with their own dna called "culture", and some cultures are more likely to be removed from the pool than others. Monogamy turned out to be great for meritocracy, accumulation of generational wealth and technical and organisational progress at increasingly large scale. Societies of gratis-whores could not compete with that and are virtually all gone. Monogamy was something like the great oxidation event of ethnology but in constant conflict with primate instincts ever since.
>tl;dr: women are property or else>marriage is not opt-in; meritocracies need every man doing his best>condemnation of homosex is not because homosex is bad for meritocracy, it's a gimmick of shaming men into marriage ("you not married? avoiding women??? are you... a FAG???")>monogamy is extremely important for getting the precious beta autists and tradies to the plantation>OR ELSE>and that else is happening as we speak>lmao 