>>21414263>First is our desire to force our ways onto others, even if we aren't personally happy we somehow know what is best for everyone else.Its not forcing anyone into anything. Its illustrating that there is an erosion of masculinity through men being incentivized to take less risk, ie: play vidya, watch cartroonz on streaming platform, eat the slop, etc. "Manosphere stuff" isnt making you do shit, but it should help you externalize internalized shortcomings that go un/underadressed
>The second is the tendency to put our failures on the external, like video games or another person. All that we do we will, if we don't do it we just didn't want it or work hard enough. Blaming video games or anime is cope, plenty of successful people engage with both.Plenty of doctors, lawers, politicians, businessmen, stockbrokers, construction magnates and so on smoke CRACK. Let that sink in, they're successful both financially and socially, yet they still smoke crack. Plenty of "successful" folk do dumb shit and still fall ass backwards into being accepted. Vidya and Troontoonz might not be the reason, but they are not doing anything to help you get ahead.
>Perhaps we have a third logical fallacy here as well, the inability of the human brain to understand statistics in application. Most people are not rich, most people play video games. Are video games the reason for their lack of wealth? That logic is reductive. Most people simply CANT be #1.Yes. Indirectly, but yes. Here's the logic:
>Time is finite>Your time is more valuable than money>Using time to learn/socialize/get fit/generally exist has value both socially and personally>Investing your time into something that pays no dividends and ruins your body due to apathy is like investing by lighting your money on fireHope this helps.
