>>12758215We haven't yet seen an example of gravitic propulsion, only attraction, so we're missing half of the situation there.
Welp, better just substitute the lack of an explanation with another dualism right? "Photons" seem a likely candidate since a photon was already described using a dualism, but because we already used it to describe light we can't use it for magnetism. What about "virtual photons"? That will really give the general public a bread and circus show to talk about!
