>>12108369->le seppo is splainin stuff
Ho-lee fuck.
>You understand? Do I understand what I just fucking told you? I reckon I might. Did you understand it? Apparently not a fucking word.
If the US army still wants tanks then the USMC getting rid of tanks is not due to some shift in the nature of warfare is it? No! It's something unique to the USMC. It doesn't even apply to all of Americas armed forces, let alone military affairs in general.
Do you understand that you fucking retard?
> chinese won't be shipping their tanks across the globe. When was the last time America went to war on it's own soil? 1812. When the steam engine was still in it's infancy and the primary weapon of war was the musket. How many times has America been to war since 1812?
>Haji can't afford tanksHaji can afford tanks, you've been fighting barely trained civilians, and you're not winning. Every country in the middle east has tanks, some of them very modern russian tanks.
Sum all of that up and it means the American experience with tanks means exactly FUCK ALL. And not just to everyone else, even American military planners, as corrupt and useless as they are, should not be looking at the American experience with tanks as a guide to tank development.
That's how far away you are from a relevant point when you point out the USMC got rid of tanks.
You understand? Okay, back to tank posting.