>>21460111>you wont accept anything, as usual. what wold you accept?You have presented ZERO evidence for curvature.
You have no evidence for curvature.
How could footage that is ACKNOWLEDGED to be from a source with fisheye lens, possibly prove curvature?
It's not evidence for curvature. You haven't posted any evidence for curvature at all.
I would accept LITERALLY any evidence for curvature.