>>9186357well i had to explain my points thoroughly u kno?
yes i'll be working the next 5 days
nice good work
>>9186380that's certainly one interpretation you could have
i suppose that's true. it's funny because it's actually a popular meme among content creators that "reaction content isn't content" and it's incredibly low hanging fruit, so even ones that do commentary frequently have to shield themselves from getting labelled as a "reactor"
that reminds me, have you ever seen self-labelled instagram or tik tok ""comedians""? they're absolutely some of the funniest people i've seen in my entire life for all the wrong reasons
