>>8847952Okay so here's the big think. Say that I were to attempt to prove her gender. All images could be considered faked and the shit posting would commence. Medical documentation is evidently not enough to prove ones gender and in the world of [current year] there's no real legitimate way to prove anything outside of live streaming it. Then we come right back to the whole gender proofing debate here. Say that with the rules now in place being fully understood would one attest that the only true way to proof a female online would be for her to livestream her own pap smear then immediately afterward have sex with a biological male live on cam to prove no camera wizardry?
Is this the lengths you would like people to go to in order to "prove" things online?
If so you're a sick fuck.
