>>11869958Oh, dear, dear dear Jack.
Nothing in my post was encrypted.
1. "moon's" is technically correct, as I was using the possessive of the Moon's journey through time to example
2. That I had "once read" that though There's is melt "somewhere" (note: in this example, Greenland), in the "balance of all things" there will be "freeze" elsewhere. Greenland was the subject of the article I read a long time back, which used Greenland AS its example of how, though its shoreline mass diminished, it was, in fact, gaining mass in its upper regions.
>The only thing that comes to mind would be the ice on the Antarctica getting tallerWhile Antarctica might serve as another example of what I was saying...I had no underlying or encrypted thoughts in mind when I posted. Your consideration of "Pole shift" had nothing to do with my post...
...however, All things considered, I can see how you might have thought otherwise...IF, in fact, I had been encrypting something "other" in my post.
~~~~~~~~~
Whew, Jack. It would besoooo much easier if you Didn't have a feeling that I am anything other than WHO I truly am, my fren.
>a certain quoteHmm.
FINALLY...those last two sets of comments:
>Don't look there. Look here?>Don't look up. Look down?was just me suggesting that the the 'global warming' psyops has a habit of zeroing in on certain narratives, never presenting the complete picture that can be found should people dare look beyond where they're telling them to look. In this case: ice melt
I Don't mean any harm. I never mean any harm.
