>>6130289The first half of that colocation says basically: assuming truth is something that eventually will emerge, and it is the byproduct of a logic argument, linguistic will work as a logic language. Then you can generalize even further that your words and ideas are merely a certain distance from the truth, and most of our ideas are of variable meaning, which is an awesome and tangible result, but in reality dont makes much sense because it can be of variable truth
This then descend onto a series of statements trying to hold themselves on quicksand
