>>18602004>That is not what actus purus means. Yes it does, Actus purus, the Pure Act, I’m not stupid I know what that means. Now I recognise the Holy Roman & Apostolic Catholic Church has not formally stated the theory of participation in God as the only correct theory of what heaven is like, but it’s definitely a theory that is allowed.
>And I could say the same for you.How am I misrepresenting my opposition here? Serious question please give me an example.