>>10048809It may be a flawed argument, but it is interesting nevertheless and I think I agree with it too. I'd say that it is flawed only because of the fact that "real" is often defined by what people perceive to be as a sort of collective consciousness. If a colour looks blue to you but green to everyone else, then which one of these perceptions is the real one? Both, perhaps, if reality is subjective. Yet it can be just as true that one of these parties is colourblind. Now what truly constitutes as colourblindness can be, again, subjective.
The problem about idle thought is that, like you said above, questions beget more questions and few satisfactory answers. The more you study the more you realise how little you or humanity in general knows.
>Only if you're over 30.I'm barely over 20.
