>>11788801Don't you like damp weather? The air feels even fresher after it rains.
>but I thought the other one is the guy that asks me what I think of cars cuz hes looking into buying one?No, that's a third Aussie. There's the erotic somelier and professional translator, the one who has manga reaction pics and had an operation sometime in the summer, and the one who likes cars is different from those two. If I am correct, that is...
>atleast it isn't a tourist bubble like croatia was, but given ths migration rates it had of citizens going to croatia I reckon it still a hellholeIs a country being a tourist bubble bad? Eh, I can see why. It drives the prices up and you can never have a moment of peace during holiday season. If memory serves right the Italians from Rome and Venice are so fed up with tourists by this point that they have started protesting at one point.
>having sex with locals (during a campaign or long passages of time while away from your spouse)>indulging in open and expositional acts of lust and sodomy while your significant other is resuding currently in your householdBoth are cheating, and neither is excuseable if you believe that cheating is bad.
>they are made to be 80% perfect everytimeThat's exactly my dilemma with older women... Hey, we do have something in common it seems.
>I'm sorry but you do know you can't get preggers from gay sex, right?But I specifically stated that (and we are only talking hypothetically here) children should be taken out of the equation completely, as that is the only problem here, isn't it? If, again hypothetically, there was literally no way for the woman to get pregnant, then would you still say it's all that different from being gay? Both are/were shunned by society for being unnatural, but if the incestuous couple can't produce offspring either (hypothetically) then why would one be worse than the other?
I am not actually pro incest by the way, but I do think it's an interesting topic to debate.
