>>10603133>33Checked
>I think the message I am getting from it in present contextWell, yes... in present context of geopolitical & domestic tomfukery, your analysis is succinct.
We were discussing the stuff of nursery tales.
I was speaking of what happens when others are employed to enact a string of events, each one bigger and more dangerous than the last, confident that in getting away with the last, a bigger approach on the next will surely not backfire.
>i hope some meet that end under the imprimatur of lawYes. That's what I love most about POTUS. He's very careful to exact certain justices under the law, rather than dish it out eye-for-an-eye style & just be DONE with THAT problem. Brennan & Bolton come to mind.
Any behind-the-scenes necessities are valid in a state of war, however, to win back the deluded psyches of the many victims of DS chaos, the imprimatur of law needs to be SEEN to be accepted & understood.
Otherwise, chaos will surely continue to reign, with a blowback that tears us assunder.
>it is beyond well deserved as far as i can see.Well beyond, in my estimation. In fact, more merciful than deserved.
So many lives have been lost, shattered & irreparably harmed; I really wish 'no mercy' at sentencing would be in play.
They've been so diabolical, ANY of them 'simply going to prison' is a red-flag in my book. I can't see them ever reforming. The ones in prison can still remain active, even if just for the guidance, knowledge, & contacts they have.
>Though, I guess there is only so much we can do, lest we be seen as tyrannical. Still, absolute justice for all would probably prove the best optic for the magnitude of treasonous crimes that have been enacted. It might very well prove that others will think twice moving forward, if the death penalty is absolute.
