>>3462253Probably glowing in the dark mix of truth and nonsense masquerading as insider information.
Literally everything 'revealed' by Q has pretty much already been revealed by /pol/ over the years.
A little inductive reasoning could have brought you to the same conclusions. It may be just some newfag boomer that fancies themselves as special.
I recognize the triple +++ associated with emperor Trump's Twatter, but the timing could also have been exploitative for legitimacy. In any case, it certainly swayed a lot of people to /ourside/, but it also swayed them away from /ourdirection/.
I am still skeptical.
