>>18118751Just ask him for the measured beam spread. If you ask enough times he leaves the thread ashamed of his own deception.
>>18118754>still no beam spread measurementThat's OK, we know it was 400-500 ft wide, maybe even worse depending on the laser, making it easily visible at the distance recorded even before refraction.
Here, have a shot of Earth on 6x6 film years before CGI or Photoshop.
>>18118755That's possibly the dumbest reply I've ever read. No it could not have an equation for folding space and work you dumb shit.
