>>6658422"However, other historians disagreed with Ohler's approach. Nicholaus Waschmann wrote that 'Ohler's hyperbole stands in the way of sober understanding (...) [he] appears to mix fact and fiction.'; Dagmar Herzog expressed the view that 'Ohler's analysis does not withstand close scrutiny. (…) Anyone seeking a deepened understanding of the Nazi period must be wary of a book that provides more distraction and distortion than clarification'; and James Pugh judged that while the book is an 'engaging and entertaining piece of journalistic history', it was 'troubling based on its tone, scholarship and engagement with the literature'.[17][18][19] Richard J. Evans, Regius Professor of History at the University of Cambridge from 2008 to 2014, author of History of the Third Reich, called Blitzed 'a crass and dangerously inaccurate account'[20] He also wrote that the book is 'morally and politically dangerous', because it implies that Hitler was not responsible for his actions. Ohler rejected this claim.[21] Evans replied: "Blitzed belongs not in the world of serious history, but in the new landscape of ‘post-truth’ and ‘alternative facts’".[22]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_OhlerThe author of "Blitzed" coincidentally moved to Tel Aviv after he published the book. Imagine that. The truth is there's proof the anti-tobacco vegetarian was on painkillers three weeks after the assassination attempt in 1944 (OSS translation of Morell's written notes) and the OSS claims that Morrell claimed that he gave Hitler nine doses of Vitamultin right at the end of war.
