>>20871692>in ww1, they were gentlemen. they fought with honour.not really. they started the chemical warfare, rape of belgium and so on. they were called the Hun. but with WW1's conclusion a lot of people considered the war just a political play between monarchies and "the elites" and were quite disillusioned (kinda like we all are now... despite all the habbenings in ookraine) and adopted a kind of knee-jerk reaction to WW1 propaganda, thinking it exaggerated and what not. then WW2 came and well, people like you were shocked, smarter people (like Churchill) weren't so shocked... ahh, history. anyway, with hindsight i think we can agree WW1 "allied propaganda" was simply the Truth... the hun is the hun and there's no need to beat around the bush
I love the 3 stated purposes of NATO:
>to keep the germs down>to keep the russians out>to keep America inthat's what we need
