>>18937615It's illegal to control the flow of evidence. When it was legal, sex crimes towards children dropped significantly. If possession of child pornography was legal, then you would have physical evidence some rich, powerful man was fucking a kid. But because it's illegal, your first thought is to destroy the evidence, throwing hard-drives into the dump.
So you're currently in a situation where the only people who can this evidence of a crime are the police, who are peddling it online to make a quick buck off of sickos. And able to shred any hard evidence regarding Billy and Trump on Epstein's island.