>>1194919>wow you didn't answer all ten of my retarded questions I asked in one post? k kiddoI'm saying if the argument is governments are naturally corruptible because humans are naturally corruptible, why would you think corporate enclaves and hierarchies are going to act any different? Basically you're wanting feudalism all while not actually explaining the benefits of living in a society where the law doesn't exist, but a contrived natural law of "muh aggression principle" is the rule of the land even if I have absolutely no incentive to follow it.
>kill everyone I disagree withNo, we'd just be killing the people who are wrong.
