>>5798518live their lives for someone else*
>>5798569If you want an example of authoritarianism not working you can take a look at the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany. Both devolved into police states in the 30s and 40s where the central government exploited the people for only the benefit of the state and no this nebulous concept of "society".
Rome existed as a republic for centuries in a time prior to the dark ages with massive social mobility (although worse than today's) and they had no troubles. It wasn't an RPG lad you couldn't just choose to spec into a different class if you didn't like being poor and uneducated, circumstances of birth dictated someones life more than their personal ability ever would. Somalia doesn't have a broken government out of the personal choice of anyone living there but because their previous regime was destroyed when they lost the war to Ethiopia. Authoritarianism only serves to limit people, what you're advocating sounds more like collectivism which doesn't require extreme authoritarianism inherently.
Feudalism was a good idea? You tugging my dick here or what mate?
>>5798597should be lower tbqhwymfbmtfmgtms
Did you agree to a lot of free market shit? Sometimes I'll end up closer to the centre due to that.
