>>12677284Themselves
>>12677285Multiple things are wrong with what you said, but I'll start with perhaps the major issue: Doing that is completely and totally unsustainable, requiring advanced manufacturing, 24/7 maintenance, massive amounts of consistent power development and output, not to mention the infrastructure to sustain that.
All while dealing the lose of millions of competent and skilled workers and managers while reallocating and retraining those jobs lost to people who survived only for their obedience. With technology that isn't even with feasible development range of our lives using materials that are simultaneously expensive to produce and manufacture en-masse.
