>>23240708>And yet, no proof. Funny how that worksOh no that’s cool man, we don’t need “proof” to know that you do in fact believe me. We have an empirical way of demonstrating that:
Do you concede that, hypothetically, if those things WERE true, they would make me significantly more formidable than you as a man in every measurable respect? Just a hypothetical yes or no on that one chief
(You will be unable to give an honest “yes” answer, because you do secretly believe these stats about me are true, and admitting it would mean admitting my superiority)
