>>8066690>I still believe that natural selection works this way as a research programme. Nevertheless, I have changed my mind about the testability and logical status of the theory of natural selection; and I am glad to have an opportunity to make a recantation. My recantation may, I hope, contribute a little to the understanding of the status of natural selection.http://mertsahinoglu.com/research/karl-popper-on-the-scientific-status-of-darwins-theory-of-evolution/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Popper#Origin_and_evolution_of_lifeIf you, or the people on /pol/ knew anything about Popper you would know he changed his views on evolution. You'd also know that Popper never believed that if something isn't a science that means it's wrong. He was fundamentally concerned with the demarcation problem, separating science from non-science. If something isn't scientific that means it isn't falsifiable, that doesn't necessarily mean it's false, you just can't test it.
