>>12977259> God cannot make mistakes or lie which instantly proves you are not GodHow is this supposed to be a proof of Jesus being God? It's a proof in your mind only.
A liar can keep saying he doesn't lie.
A mistakes-making can claim he doesn't do any mistakes. All his apparent mistakes he can frame as done on the purpose and something you perceive as mistakes only because you're not on his level.
He will be completely indistinguishable to the outside world from the one truly not-lying and truly-not-making-mistakes. The only thing making you choose one over the other is your faith, to which everything boils down again.
There is no proof. You just showed an empty shell.
I swear, Christian apologists are pathetic. Instead of owning their faith like men they insist on making some logical hocus-pocus and saying "gotcha!".
Well, no, you don't.
And that's just the start. I'm not even mentioning the dubiousness of the terms you use and take for granted (not making mistakes? what does it even mean outside of human experience with the physical world? Not lying? What does it even mean outside of inter-human interaction?)
Also it's funny how you claim Satan to be a Grand Deceiver but at the same time you deem it impossible to be under his spell. Only others can be. So you are greater than Satan, to see so easily through his lies? That's quite an accomplishment, considering he's the enemy of the God himself. I wouldn't be so sure if I were you.
The fact is all your Christian apologetics is just a coping strategy to keep your fragile Christian identity intact. If you let the anti-Christian arguments penetrate you, your inner world would collapse, and you would have to deal with a massive cognitive dissonance. A very unpleasant experience. So you make those pseudo-argument along with other pseudo-truth-defenders of your kind, and convince yourself you prove anything in an objective manner you so desperately cling to.