>>19282994>That radio calculator is not at all inaccurateSo, the battle of beams shows the lack of curvature ?
>No because that radio doesn't include certain valuesSo, it's NOT accurate
>Oh, no, it's perfectly accurateSo the battle of beams shows the lack of curvature
>No, because although that radio is PERFECTLY ACCURATE it DIDN'T PERFECTLY ACCURATELLY calculate the values for battle of beams>Mental gymnastics on your part>i think he just uses that radio LOS calculator because it includes the effect of standard refraction, which most dont.Includes an imaginary value that is never observable on that altitude.
Here's the geometrical calculation.
It shows 5000 meters curve so somehow that refraction bent it perfectly without side effects over a 1000 m difference
