>>16789536To people who say "Children can't consent to sex", always remember that social liberal progress doesn't care about your "consent". If you refuse to consent, you're a criminal. The only criminal when a human has "non-consensual" sexual relations with a child is the party withholding consent, likely the child, because the only criminal action here is withholding consent from an act of social liberal progress.
>your consent doesn't matter>racial integration = consent irrelevant>women's rights = consent irrelevant>colored's rights = consent irrelevant>labor rights = consent irrelevant>religious freedom = consent irrelevant>emancipation of slaves = consent irrelevant>LBGT rights = consent irrelevant>Child Rapist Rights = consent irrelevantIf you attempt to withold consent and submission to progress, this is a crime, go to jail. Clearly the only person who is commiting a "crime" when a person "rapes" a child is the child, since withholding consent is the crime, since clearly it is 100% legal for social liberal progress to brutally and unapologetically rape you, then throw you in prison if you attempt to resist. If you can't understand the very simple pattern that defines Western history, I would go ask an adult for help. If you oppose the legalization of child rape and the establishment for equal opportunity anti-discrimination laws to protect child rapists, you're on the wrong side of history.
CIVIL RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS
