>>6555722It has been bothering me quite a lot, but I think that we must make classifications for women. Meaning that women have eroded our ability to put them into classes of sorts. At least socially. It should be socially reprehensible for a lower class woman to try to marry up. Even to interact with middle and upper class men. It should be kinda like the caste system in India. Both men and women should be subjected for it. Because right now in this gynocentric society it feels like only men are subjected to it.
No woman should be able to marry up. And it should be quite acceptable to make distinctions on the women, and to state them even. I have found this to be quite impossible often. There is simply no talk, let alone discussion of this concept. There is this notion that "women are just good for their looks" and thats the end of it...to imply that a good looking woman can land any guy...on the entire social spectrum.
WELL I REJECT THIS NOTION. We already make distinctions based on tattoo's, drug usage, slutting about and whatever. But
EVERY FUCKNIG ATTEMPT BY PRETTY MUCH ALL WOMEN TRIES TO PREVENT US FROM LABELING THEM, AND THEN FROM ENACTING POLICIES AROUND THOSE LABELS. ITS THEIR PRIME IMPERATIVE.