>>16882774Not true, the only good arguments I’ve heard against ball earth don’t destroy the possibility of ball earth, they point out the weaknesses in prevailing scientific thought. They basically force the defendant into a corner where they must agree with one of two statements
>our model of the earth is wrong>or scientific understanding is flawedThey REFUSE to accept either of these as possible, so they spiral into a pants-shitting fit and make themselves look, miraculously, more retarded than flat earthers.