>>13428543It's actually simple reasoning a young child should be capable of. Whenever Q is wrong you just say "disinformation is necessary" and whenever some post can tangentially be related to world events you say "Q predicted his.
Really, what you got was a couple sprinkles of truth (mostly sourced from here) on a giant shit sundae that you can't stop gobbling down. You should consider the possibility that Q is not what you think he/they is/are.
