>>15602869>are you a fucking retard or something? no
>three-boyd problem doesn't say that gravity is wrong it proves without a doubt that gravity is wrong
if it were right, we could model reality, what use is a theory that isn't consistent with reality?
> only that there is no close-form solution "close form" is cope, just remove that word, there's no solution. You can't model your own model with gravity. That's a fact. The ONLY thing ANYONE knows about gravity is that it's wrong (you can tell yourself incomplete because you're a gravity cultist).
>number of degrees of freedomwhew you guys break down in gibberish the first chance you get.