>>5100074Interpretation of what genetic variability is, is so variable across cultures and milieux... That it is almost impossible to maintain such a thing as you said.
Genetic quality is not objectively assessable... At least not in the sense you mean.
Of course if somebody has a life-threatening or severely invalidating mutation, there is a strong case for genetic wanting.
However, when almost functional individuals are concerned, who knows what the challenges of future environments will be?
Our behaviour is too variable and even that side of our partner-selection system that is strongly affected by genetics is, at best, an inductivist turkey. This means that past success might affect future decisions as per which partner is better. Such decisions can be conscious, culturally induced, learned, or even, fuck me, entrenched in our very genes. Yet, this is just an attempt at predicting future challenges our offspring will face and choose a partner accordingly.
But guess what? Randomness, variability, maladaptive reactions to unprecedented environments. All of this shit makes our choice a guess, at best.
I am fucking sick of sick fucks like you who do not understand jack shit of genetics. You go around parroting the dumb lies spreaded by Herbert Spencer or whatever 19th Century dumbfuck you have read about in your high school library - - assuming you have ever set foot in such a holy shrine.
