>>12811643I agree, in many respects. We have plenty of written information about the masons. It's one thing to read something on a shitty website, or see the pen and ink drawings in a hundred year old book; but it's quite another to see people openly talking about it in the modern year. This video will wake up many people that never would have encountered the more esoteric literature.
>>12811648This. It's more important to get unaware people up to speed than it is getting seasoned conspiracy theorists new content to consoom.
>>12811651Probably. I suspect this might be a limited hangout. After all, if (((they))) are really behind it, the Mason's primary role is going to be to take the flak for it; it might be time to cash those chips in.
