>>9484319>anything i cant answer/dont like/goes against my narrative is "retarded"if its retarded it shouldnt be hard to counter it with logic, no? surely something so basic and stupid should be easily explained away? except you avoid that "retarded question" like the plague. dont throw stones in glass houses, anon. you are clearly studied on a few things and i dont disagree with you on a whole lot. but you are desperately clinging to the WE WUZ mentality which is your crutch
