Quoted By:
1/3
PCR tests are virtually meaningless as indicators and run at prior to extremely recent cycle thresholds are basically 0% reliable. PCR tests have been run at a cycle threshold hovering around 40 for literally all year until Biden stepped in when then slightly lowered it. The way the test works has been settled science for years and is elegant but extremely basic. Running the test at this high of a cycle threshold has roughly a 0% degree of reliability.
See
Here I shared the link to the Nobel nominated chemist proving it wrong as well as another study
The WHO (just like when Biden stepped in) just recently changed methodology to >28 cycles (again, see here I shared that same link) following the vaccine campaign. Both of these changes came with literally no novel discoveries. So why did the standard cycle threshold run at something which was known to be unsound for the whole year. Why did it lower slightly literally 3 hours after Biden stepped in (not kidding the WHO literally did)? Why is Ivermectin not recognized by the FDA as a treatment despite virtually all research (all but possibly one study) confirming its efficacy, as well as empirical observation in countries which used it and saw not just decreases in cases but deceleration (negative second derivative)? Did you know that if a drug is approved by the FDA as a treatment, pharmaceutical companies can't legally market or sell a vaccine?
