>>14615100>>14615101Who is paying you to shitpost to make all women seem as insufferable as you? Is this an attempt to draw out the
>"le all women are stupid"posters, so you can show how "sexist" /pol/ is so you can get more funding to "monitor hate speech against women"?
We know how your organizations work; go shitpost online so you can go cry to some government agency so you can get funding to tackle "Online Hate Speech" so you can get paid for "Saving the World!".
If you'd like to actually refute anything I said in my first reply:
>>14615021I would love to hear it. I, and many other posters in this thread, have given you multiple explanations as to why Feminism has no place in society.
I don't have a problem with women btw; but I do have a problem with women who have a problem with men.
