>>6891490>we ll kill you all before you exterminate what's left of us and our way of living.I think you tried that. DO IT AGAIN BOMBER HARRIS.
But in all seriousness you're being a retard. The only possible justification for taking any action whatsoever against this behaviour on the grounds of "social health" (which you are using solely to mean "things I agree with," I note) would be if you could establish a causative link between this behaviour and harm. And yes, maybe you could do that. Obviously someone is dead, and that sounds pretty harmful. But the causative link would need to do more than exist - it would need to justify intervention on the scale of death camps. And I am very doubtful you would achieve that.
That's why you're arguing dishonestly by making vague aspersions and trying to bind up all of social malaise in this one issue. When people believe that all of society is at stake they get scared and do dumb shit like build death camps. But you haven't demonstrated that all of society IS at stake. Unless, of course, what is at stake isn't ACTUALLY all of society, and is in fact just your fragile perception of it.
I have very little respect for the brainlets in the OP doing dumb shit to get their silicon-inflated rocks off, but I have even less respect for tinpot dictators from third world shitholes hypocritically preaching their backwards reactionaryism as a cure to the West's malaise from inside dead economies.
