>>30496>What exactly are you saying god didIt's a standard Thomistic argument using the universe and the fundamental laws thereof to verify the existence of an omnipotent being. That's all it is.
>and why couldn't it have been the universe just doing it naturally.Because you would be asserting that "X" originated from "X," which is fallaciously begging the question.
>due to physics we dont understand ^ This is a blind faith statement. Science, and the physics thereof, is limited to the material universe, period.
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/not-a-chance-r-c-sproul/1117039761 