>>2513920The only way such a conspiracy could be unraveled would be:
>a former of acquaintance of the Anne making a deathbed confession>the actual child (well over 70 years old) in question coming forward and having the DNA tests to prove familial relation>a random Dutch person taking a genetic test and getting a maternal link to her and having it published>someone piecing together a paper trail (i.e. adoptive family getting bank transactions from Otto as a bribe/bizarre correspondence between the parties) >Anne's body eventually being uncovered, positively identified and the autopsy finding signs of pregnancy (coroners would specifically need to have a fairly intact pelvic bone to find signs of childbirth). Even then, autopsy reports can be sealed by court order and their results would never be made public.>Otto Frank's will arranging for the disclosing of this information and assorted evidence (photos, genetic tests, diary pages he had removed and withheld from investigators) well after the last persons who knew Anne died and her diary's copyright had completely expired to prevent anyone from demanding a share of the revenue (which they would be entitled to.TL;DR unlike /pol/'s claims of her diary being a fraud, Anne Frank's having a living descendant could be surprisingly easy to conceal thanks to a lack of wartime documentation and good old fashioned political arm-twisting.
Now, get Officer Robert from /CPD/ on the case.
