>>10196711N-No, I see no fruit there. Definitely not.
>Aaa, FurankuDidn't they use children for labour too? And their tiny fingers could have been used to clean out the shells of bullets.
There certainly were some alterations. The book itself has this Hollywood-like feel to it. It's not far fetched to think that whatever it was that Anne actually wrote was altered to make the story more dramatic in order to sell more copies. If capitalism was invented by the joos then it's quite ironic that they would exploit the persecution and suffering of their compatriots to make money.
What are the differences between the original and the revised?
>The RoadLike I said, it's one of his more commercial books. Maybe try Child of God. It's very short and it sounds like something that you might find interesting.
>dad at 18That's early, you wouldn't even be able to have alone time with your wife. Not that kind of alone time.
>kikAlright, it is admirable, I admit. But I have no kik, no discord, no social media. Nor would I give them away that easily.
