>>3771593>you're implying she's trying to actually make argumentsShe's not trying to, she's making them, whatever her intentiions of motivations are.
>all she's really trying to do is get your betabuckI don't donate to her. There are more profitable markets to go to if that was the only thing she wanted. And making money while being productive and doing something you like aren't mutually exclusive.
>The explosion of online mediums has given rise to full-time professional bullshitters like her, Molyneux, Sargon, among many other totally unqualified people discussing ranges of topics they have no real understanding about.Totally a coincidence that you're only targeting right-wing people right?
Totally a coincidence that you also leave out the entire mainstream media apparatus and Hollywood, which has always been full of professional bullshitters way before the online media existed.
You're only upset that independent journalists and new media personalities are destroying the stranglehold on information that the MSM used to have, so all you can do is hopelessly character assassinate all of them.
The only people who are mad about alternative media exploding are: establishment/corporate shills, Jews and leftists like you since it's easier than ever to bypass their narrative.
Now fuck off back to /b/ to post another BLACKED thread, shill. If you didn't like online media allowing "unqualified people discussing ranges to topics", you wouldn't hypocritically be on this site.