>>16865894okay i had one
i was hoping to be proven wrong on my expectations and have it turn out to be really good or something, cause its probably been over a year since i had one and my memory isnt the best
but no it was exactly as i remembered it to be
again it wasnt really bad, more so painfully average
and remembering how much better the old version was makes it a lot worse
although the chocolate layer wasnt as thick as i thought i dont think
its just that it doesnt have that soft texture to it anymore, now its more like how chocolate covered candies have that layer covering them? but flat. i cant come up with a better example for some reason, but ya its this crunchier and still ever so slightly thicker layer and its just way inferior, the old one easily broke from a soft bite and this one u actually have to put some force into
its both bad for the feel and cause it makes it less casual to have, idk it was just nice how little it took to break a piece off the older one
besides that, its weird how you feel some bitter tasting dust in your mouth if u take too much of a bite? ya that sounds bizarre but its the only way i can explain it, it always happens too i swear im not crazy
i think its taste is just too strong even if its not really bad, maybe if it werent double layered and it was made to be less thick then it could be more tolerable? it feels like i barely taste the milk layer to be honest
and thats bad cause im p sure its supposed to be the centerpiece of the snack, its attraction is that u got a really cool bar of milk that looks and tastes nice, its not like milk chocolate though its literally just this bar of soft milk, i bet theres a brand for it in the us but i just dont know what so all i can do is describe it lol
anyway the old one, the milk layer was way thicker, like maybe half of my pinky finger thick
which was perfect, u took small bites so it didnt get too much and the chocolate didnt interfere, aaa it was nice
this one just doesnt compare
