>>15938648But what about the not-being, how can you know if the not-being is better or worse in suffering? You can't. There is no frame of reference to know if there is suffering or joy in not being, because you can only be.
>Therefore you can only know the being.>Being have: suffering and joy.>You do not know the other part. if in fact ceasing to be (death) or not being (unborn) is actually worse.>you will then sacrifice the chance of have joy for the inconvenience of experiencing sufferingYou seem to me like a coward and/or actually more sadist than the Natalists since you will deny beings the chance of experience joy at all when you domt know if the not-beimg is eternal and worst suffering
>tldrOP is a weak coward AND a sadist (probably a kike as well)
