>>14375363>Yes, that's the point of science.that is the point of unfalsifiable pseudoscience, in science you reject false theory, not revision it. pic rel.
>>14375364>but this is infact a not profable argumentProvable argument? You asked a philosophical question not a scientific one and got a good philosophical answer.
>>14375365>Mathematicians and genetic scientists have been calling it impossibleits not impossible but just highly unlikely, but not so unlikely when you have damn 6 BILLION GORRILION YEARS to revision that pseudoscience around. Modern cosmology is mostly quackery anyway
>>14375366>And then afterwards they left them alone and after several generations the tails started to grow back?that means they havent change genotype but only phenotype, so its a wow-its nothing finding.
