>>13604214You went a slightly different route which I appreciate. This is tedious because I’m only focusing in the context of the application of “deconstruction,” as it is defined in it’s strictest sense. That being said, the “double science” as it is also called, it’s first stage is to invert the values of a binary system, but that is only stage 1, not it’s purpose. The next stage is to place a new concept that is outside of that binary system. This I'm still working the details out, and I wonder it is the case that this being used, which from signs it appears to be highly suspect.
