>>20003428>Eclipses prove that we are not on a random spinning ball.Your flerf model doesn't even come close to explaining them. You offer no alternative.
>All of physical reality proves that we are not on a spinning ball.Sorry, but pretending that evidence doesn't exist doesn't make it magically disappear.
>Eclipses occure since the beginning of time in precise clockwork cycles, because the heavenly bodies are the heavenly clock.Accurate predictions of eclipses have only started appearing once people started to understand the heliocentric model in combination with laws regarding planetary motion. No flat earther can reproduce these predictions.
>And we never see an eclipse from the "ISS" in "space", we never see any real footage from spaceWe do, but you just call it CGI because you don't want it to be true. You're dogmatic.
>A curved horizon due to a lens and CGI, that's the pathetic "proof" that you believe in.Case in point.
The funny thing about your "proof" is that people did the calculations: the angular sizes are a complete mismatch. You're not looking at mountain tops, you're looking at clouds. It's a very typical example of flat earthers being deceiving liars.
>>20003432>why a rocket can't push in a pure vacuum.If you opened a physics book you would understand why this isn't a problem at all. But we all know flat earthers are too dumb to understand physics and mathematics.